Billion-dollar lawsuit could destroy top accountancy firms

Posted by Plus Master at 9:08 AM
 
Bankers, regulators, ratings agencies, politicians, shareholders and even Chinese savers have been blamed for the financial crisis, but the accountants who signed off the books of financial institutions for all those years have remained largely unscathed.

That could be about to change after it was revealed last week that PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC), the world's biggest accountancy firm, faces a $2bn (£1.2bn) lawsuit linked to Bernard Madoff's record $65bn investment fraud.

PwC was not Madoff's auditor. That job famously went to a three-person outfit without the ability or inclination to ask the necessary questions of its powerful client. The case against PwC's Canadian arm, brought by investors who lost their savings via the Madoff "feeder fund" Fairfield Sentry, is that the firm was negligent in failing to spot that Fairfield Sentry's $7.2bn of assets invested with Madoff did not exist.

The firm, it is claimed, should have spotted the "red flag" that Madoff not only executed the fund's investment strategy, but was the custodian of the money. PwC Canada stresses that it was not Madoff's auditor, adding that its auditing of the fund's financial statements "fully complied with professional standards". The case against PwC follows a lawsuit filed against KPMG claiming that the big four firm should have spotted Madoff's scam when auditing the main fund of US fund manager Tremont, which lost $213m on Madoff.

Read the full story here on the Telegraph website.

POSTED IN Directors and Officers Accountants

3 Responses to "Billion-dollar lawsuit could destroy top accountancy firms"

PLUS DTIRUER Says: August 23, 2010 (9:08AM) Yep what.s good for the goose is good for the gander. Great idea. Notice that the Chinese know how to do a stimulus package, while no one in power seems to know how to do a stimulus package here in the US. abercrombie london abercrombie abercrombie and fitch abercrombie uk abercrombie and fitchmall tiffany uk abercrombie Abercrombie outlet Abercrombie clothing ed hardy uk love kills slowly abercrombie outlet abercrombie clothing abercrombie and fitch uk abercrombie fitch uk Abercrombie & fitch uk abercrombie and fitchmall abercrombie and fitchmall abercrombie uk abercrombie and fitch uk Abercrombie & Fitch UK abercrombie fitch uk Thanks for sharing. His music will continue to rock! I think you need a bit more of a story with this as this isn't really a news story in its current form. Perhaps you could write about why you like Michael so much?
PLUS DTIRUER Says: August 23, 2010 (9:08AM) Yep what.s good for the goose is good for the gander. Great idea. Notice that the Chinese know how to do a stimulus package, while no one in power seems to know how to do a stimulus package here in the US. abercrombie london abercrombie abercrombie and fitch abercrombie uk abercrombie and fitchmall tiffany uk abercrombie Abercrombie outlet Abercrombie clothing ed hardy uk love kills slowly abercrombie outlet abercrombie clothing abercrombie and fitch uk abercrombie fitch uk Abercrombie & fitch uk abercrombie and fitchmall abercrombie and fitchmall abercrombie uk abercrombie and fitch uk Abercrombie & Fitch UK abercrombie fitch uk Thanks for sharing. His music will continue to rock! I think you need a bit more of a story with this as this isn't really a news story in its current form. Perhaps you could write about why you like Michael so much?
Please Leave a Comment

PLUS Community Disclaimer

PLUS encourages the use of these groups for the exchange of information and ideas, however, comments or material posted by others may be removed if PLUS determines it is inappropriate or offensive. User-generated content does not represent the opinion of PLUS or its members but is the sole responsibility and opinion of the user generating such content. PLUS Blog has no control over and does not endorse linked website(s), cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information found by following said links or the correctness of any analysis found therein and should not be held responsible for it or the consequences of a user's reliance on that information.