Injecting Value Into Medical Decisions In Debate on Reform

Posted by Plus Master at 8:07 AM
 

It’s widely estimated that 30% of U.S. health-care spending—some $700 billion a year—is spent on tests, treatments and procedures that provide no value. But one man’s waste may be another’s life-saving treatment. And there are hundreds of medical quandaries with no clear answers.

When is angioplasty appropriate for patients with clogged arteries?

How often should patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease have upper endoscopies?

Which of eight expensive drugs for rheumatoid arthritis work best and are worth the potentially harsh side effects?

What works best to treat low back pain or prevent obesity, hypertension and diabetes?

Is weight-bearing exercise better than bisphosphonates in preventing hip and spinal fractures in older women?

As lawmakers battle over how to expand coverage for more Americans and how to pay for it, an equally contentious issue is looming: Many experts, doctors and politicians want to revamp the U.S. health-care system to reward the quality of care.

Read this full story on the Wall Street Journal website.

POSTED IN Medical Professional

0 Responses to "Injecting Value Into Medical Decisions In Debate on Reform"

Please Leave a Comment

PLUS Community Disclaimer

PLUS encourages the use of these groups for the exchange of information and ideas, however, comments or material posted by others may be removed if PLUS determines it is inappropriate or offensive. User-generated content does not represent the opinion of PLUS or its members but is the sole responsibility and opinion of the user generating such content. PLUS Blog has no control over and does not endorse linked website(s), cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information found by following said links or the correctness of any analysis found therein and should not be held responsible for it or the consequences of a user's reliance on that information.